Claud Butler Ridge vs Wrath - Full Comparison Guide
If you want a nimble, urban-capable eMTB, choose the Ridge; if you need longer range and bigger wheels for trail riding, pick the Wrath.
Bold power and gears mark the 2.0 Ridge upgrades, while the Wrath 2.0 raises battery capacity and wheel size for tougher terrain.
You’ll find a clear comparison of motors, batteries, brakes, and gearing ahead, plus how those specs change the way each bike handles on short commutes or long off-road rides.
Expect a side‑by‑side table and a straightforward verdict to help you pick the bike that fits your rides.
Claud Butler Ridge vs Wrath - Key Differences
You’ll find the Ridge focuses on trail fun and a slightly more modern feature set, while the Wrath leans toward a versatile, value-packed eMTB.
Key differences show up in frame shape, motor feel, wheel size, and component choices.
Frame Design and Geometry
The Ridge uses a 6061 aluminium hardtail frame with a more upright, confidence-inspiring riding position.
You sit slightly higher and closer to the bars, which helps control on twisty singletrack and short technical climbs.
Internal cable routing and a removable integrated battery keep the frame clean and reduce snag points when you ride off-road.
The Wrath frames are similar in build material but often aim for a balanced, slightly more commuter-friendly geometry.
That gives you a stable feel at speed and on mixed surfaces.
Both ranges offer Medium and Large sizing; choose based on your height and preferred handling rather than on small geometry tweaks.
Battery and Motor Performance
Both Ridge 2.0 and Wrath 2.0 use a 375Wh integrated battery that charges in about five hours and can be removed with a key.
This makes it easy to charge off the bike and keeps the weight low in the frame.
Motor choice differs by model. Ridge 2.0 and some Wrath variants use a Bafang rear hub motor offering about 45Nm of torque.
That motor gives quick, strong pulls on climbs but feels more suited to leisure and trail riding than full-on e-MTB use.
You’ll notice faster motor pick-up on the newer software in Wrath 2.0 models, which helps from a standing start.
Wheel Size and Suspension
The Ridge commonly runs 27.5" (650B) wheels with 2.35" tyres and a 120mm travel front fork.
Those wheels and tyre width give nimble handling and good grip on mixed trails.
The 120mm fork soaks up bumps but keeps the bike light and responsive.
Wrath models vary more between 1.0 and 2.0, with some using similar wheel sizes but different fork setups.
Expect a trail-friendly front suspension on both ranges, often with a hydraulic lockout to firm the fork for climbs or road sections.
Pick the Ridge if you want slightly livelier, more agile handling on singletrack.
Groupset and Braking Systems
Ridge 2.0 ships with a 1x9 Shimano Cues groupset and an 11-46T cassette. That gives a wide gear range and simple shifting for off-road use.
Braking upgrades include Shimano MT200 hydraulic disc brakes, which give consistent stopping power and modulation.
Wrath 2.0 moves to Shimano Cues 1x10 with an 11-48T cassette on some bikes, and also uses Shimano MT200 hydraulic discs.
Wrath 1.0 models may use mechanical or entry-level hydraulic setups and different drivetrain mixes.
Overall, the Wrath 2.0 slightly improves shifting range and responsiveness, while both bikes use reliable hydraulic brakes for confident stopping in wet or muddy conditions.
Ride experience and feature comparison between Ridge & Wrath
You can expect the Ridge to feel nimble and responsive, while the Wrath focuses on stability and longer rides.
The two share some kit, but differences in wheel size, battery, and torque shape how they ride and what they suit.
Off-Road Capabilities and Terrain Handling
The Ridge uses 27.5" wheels and a 120 mm fork, so it turns quicker and feels more agile on tight trails and mixed urban paths.
You’ll notice faster direction changes and easier handling on rooty or twisty singletrack.
The Ridge 2.0’s 45 Nm motor gives a stronger, punchier kick on short climbs than the 1.0’s 32 Nm.
The Wrath runs 29" wheels with a 100 mm fork. That larger wheel rolls over obstacles more smoothly and keeps momentum on rutted tracks and fire roads.
The Wrath 2.0’s 45 Nm torque and bigger 540 Wh battery make it better for sustained climbs and rougher, longer off-road days.
Tyre width and tread on the Wrath favour traction and comfort at speed.
Range, Ride Metrics and User Experience
Ridge models use a 375 Wh battery; expect roughly up to 40 miles (64 km) depending on assistance, weight, and terrain.
Charge time sits around five hours. Ridge 2.0 adds a smarter colour display and more precise gearing (1×9), so you get better data and smoother cadence transitions.
Wrath 1.0 has a ~360 Wh pack and similar range figures, while Wrath 2.0 boosts to ~540 Wh for nearer 60 miles (97 km) in favourable conditions.
The Wrath 2.0 display gives more trip stats — average/max speed, trip time, and energy used — so you can manage long rides better.
Both use Bafang rear hub motors; the 2.0 versions step up torque and assist smoothness.
Practical Features for UK Riders
Both bikes include walk-assist and lockout forks, useful for muddy paths or carrying the bike over stiles.
The Ridge’s lighter, smaller-wheel setup suits town-to-trail commutes, narrow lanes, and aluminium frame durability in UK weather.
Key-lock battery on some Ridge models helps prevent theft when parked.
The Wrath’s larger battery and 29×2.40" tyres suit long weekend rides and bridleways across varied British terrain.
Hydraulic Shimano MT200 brakes on 2.0 models give firmer stopping in wet conditions.
Wider bars and a more stable frame on the Wrath also improve control on fast descents and gravel tracks.
Comparison table between Ridge and Wrath
Below is a clear table to help you compare the main specs at a glance. Use it to match the bike to your riding needs.
| Feature | Ridge (1.0 / 2.0) | Wrath (1.0 / 2.0) |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel size | 27.5″ | 29″ |
| Battery | 375 Wh (both) | 360 Wh (1.0) → 540 Wh (2.0) |
| Motor torque | 32 Nm → 45 Nm (2.0) | 32 Nm → 45 Nm (2.0) |
| Gearing | 1×8 (1.0) → 1×9 Cues (2.0) | 1×9 (1.0) → 1×10 Cues (2.0) |
| Brakes | Mechanical (1.0) → Shimano MT200 hydraulic (2.0) | Tektro/MT200 hydraulic (1.0 & 2.0) |
| Suspension | 120 mm fork | 100 mm fork |
| Range estimate | Up to ~40 miles | ~40 miles (1.0) → ~60 miles (2.0) |
| Stand-out use | Nimble, mixed urban/trail | Longer rides, trail-focused |
The Ridge favours agility and a lighter feel thanks to its smaller wheels and shorter travel. It suits mixed terrain and daily use where quick handling matters.
The Wrath offers bigger wheels and larger battery options on the 2.0, giving you more roll-over ability and longer range. Choose it when you expect longer rides or tougher trails.
Final verdict
You’ll find the Ridge suits you if you want a nimble, lighter bike for mixed use and shorter rides.
It keeps 27.5" wheels, a compact battery, and improved 2.0 components for better braking and gearing without adding bulk.
If your priority is longer range and a more trail-focused feel, the Wrath is the better match.
The 29" wheels, larger 2.0 battery option, and higher torque make it easier on longer rides and rougher ground.
Think about where you’ll ride most. Choose the Ridge for agility and urban or mixed-terrain rides.
Choose the Wrath for off-road comfort, extra range, and steadier handling at speed.